Skip to main content

 

VAULT Quick Links

< All Topics
Print

Slodov, Ike v. United States, 436 U.S. 238 (1978)

The Supreme Court decision in the case of “Slodov v. United States” (1978) addressed the issue of whether a person who assumes control of a corporation after trust fund tax liabilities have accrued can be held personally liable under Section 6672 of the Internal Revenue Code for those unpaid taxes.

Key Points:

  1. Background: Ike Slodov, an orthodontist, purchased three corporations engaged in the food vending business. At the time of purchase, the corporations had an outstanding tax liability of approximately $250,000 for federal wage and Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) taxes withheld from employees’ wages. These funds had been dissipated by the previous management before Slodov acquired the businesses.
  2. Legal Proceedings:
  1. The IRS assessed responsible person penalties against Slodov under Section 6672, arguing that he was liable for the unpaid taxes because he used after-acquired funds to pay other creditors instead of the IRS.
  2. The bankruptcy judge initially ruled in favor of Slodov, finding that he was not liable for the taxes accrued before he took control.
  3. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed this decision, holding Slodov personally liable for the unpaid taxes.
  4. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the issue.

Supreme Court Decision:

  1. Key Legal Principles:
  1. Section 6672: Imposes personal liability on any person required to collect, truthfully account for, and pay over any tax who willfully fails to do so.
  2. Section 7501: Deems withheld taxes to be a “special fund in trust for the United States.”
  3. Court’s Analysis:
  1. The Court held that Section 6672 was not intended to impose an absolute liability without personal fault for failure to “pay over” amounts that should have been collected and paid over.
  2. The Court emphasized that there must be a nexus between the funds collected and the trust created under Section 7501. This means that the trust fund taxes must be directly traceable to the collected taxes.
  3. The Court rejected the IRS’s argument that all after-acquired funds of the corporation were impressed with a trust for the payment of overdue withholding taxes.
  4. Outcome:
  1. The Supreme Court reversed the Sixth Circuit’s decision, holding that Slodov was not liable under Section 6672 for the unpaid taxes accrued before he took control of the corporations.
  2. The Court concluded that a responsible person does not violate Section 6672 by willfully using employer funds for purposes other than satisfaction of the trust-fund tax claims of the United States when, at the time he assumed control, there were no funds with which to satisfy the tax obligation, and the funds thereafter generated are not directly traceable to collected taxes.

Conclusion:

The Supreme Court’s decision in “Slodov v. United States” clarified that a person who assumes control of a corporation after trust fund tax liabilities have accrued is not personally liable under Section 6672 for those unpaid taxes if the corporation had no liquid assets to pay the taxes at the time of the takeover and the after-acquired funds are not directly traceable to the collected taxes. This decision emphasized the importance of personal fault and the tracing of funds in determining liability under Section 6672.

Go to Top